This sample week was recorded before Bark Marker began stamping each incident with a clock check, so its times are the unit’s own. In a current report each incident shows whether the unit’s clock had been checked against a phone or an internet time source during the same power-on.
| Date | Incidents | Bark | First | Last | Hourly pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11 Jul 2026 | 7 | 124 | 20:39 | 20:55 | |
| Sun 12 Jul 2026 | 4 | 10 | 18:54 | 19:01 | |
| Mon 13 Jul 2026 | 10 | 65 | 06:41 | 19:19 | |
| Tue 14 Jul 2026 | 3 | 94 | 06:44 | 19:13 | |
| Wed 15 Jul 2026 | 3 | 34 | 05:57 | 19:02 | |
| Thu 16 Jul 2026 | 5 | 43 | 07:25 | 17:57 | |
| Fri 17 Jul 2026 | 3 | 188 | 10:01 | 18:38 |
Tip: rotate your phone, or swipe the table sideways, to see every column.
| Date | Time | Type | Bark | Dur. | Level | dBFS | Near sound | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-11 | 20:39:45 | bark ✓ verified | 27 | 78s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:41:48 | aggressive ✓ verified | 6 | 32s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:46:10 | bark ✓ verified | 10 | 64.8s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:47:59 | bark ✓ verified | 3 | 4.8s | -46 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:48:35 | bark ✓ verified | 34 | 110.9s | -42 dBFS | Emergency vehicle Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:52:36 | bark ✓ verified | 43 | 146.1s | -39 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-11 | 20:55:01 | bark ✓ verified | 1 | 0.1s | -53 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-12 | 18:54:17 | single | 4 | 45s | -42 dBFS | Vehicle Train | auto-matched 92% | |
| 2026-07-12 | 18:55:46 | bark | 1 | 0.5s | -46 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 95% | |
| 2026-07-12 | 19:01:00 | bark | 1 | 0.5s | -42 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 97% | |
| 2026-07-12 | 19:01:54 | bark | 4 | 16.3s | -42 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 96% | |
| 2026-07-13 | 06:41:16 | bark | 2 | 0.1s | -43 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 92% | |
| 2026-07-13 | 06:45:41 | single | 1 | 0.1s | -47 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 91% | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:33:48 | single | 34 | 59.5s | -42 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 93% | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:42:10 | bark ✓ verified | 13 | 31.2s | -41 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:43:57 | bark ✓ verified | 4 | 37.8s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle Train | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:44:23 | bark ✓ verified | 1 | 0.4s | -46 dBFS | Vehicle Emergency vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:45:05 | bark ✓ verified | 4 | 28s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:46:06 | bark ✓ verified | 4 | 2.7s | -47 dBFS | Vehicle Aircraft | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 18:46:43 | bark ✓ verified | 1 | 0.2s | -43 dBFS | Vehicle | — | |
| 2026-07-13 | 19:19:15 | bark | 1 | 0.4s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 97% | |
| 2026-07-14 | 06:44:12 | bark | 3 | 24.5s | -43 dBFS | — | auto-matched 95% | |
| 2026-07-14 | 18:34:33 | single | 90 | 236.9s | -39 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 92% | |
| 2026-07-14 | 19:13:10 | bark | 1 | 0.6s | -45 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 95% | |
| 2026-07-15 | 05:57:20 | bark | 12 | 47.2s | -42 dBFS | — | auto-matched 94% | |
| 2026-07-15 | 14:46:29 | bark | 18 | 122.7s | -41 dBFS | Vehicle Train | auto-matched 90% | |
| 2026-07-15 | 19:02:15 | single | 4 | 6.6s | -44 dBFS | — | auto-matched 95% | |
| 2026-07-16 | 07:25:12 | bark | 2 | 0.8s | -50 dBFS | Train | auto-matched 90% | |
| 2026-07-16 | 07:29:57 | bark | 4 | 14.9s | -44 dBFS | — | — | |
| 2026-07-16 | 09:17:48 | bark | 8 | 69.4s | -40 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 93% | |
| 2026-07-16 | 17:17:06 | single | 27 | 181.1s | -36 dBFS | — | auto-matched 90% | |
| 2026-07-16 | 17:57:11 | single | 2 | 4.4s | -44 dBFS | Vehicle | auto-matched 95% | |
| 2026-07-17 | 10:01:01 | single | 7 | 43.8s | -45 dBFS | Train Vehicle | auto-matched 91% | |
| 2026-07-17 | 13:15:25 | bark | 178 | 600.5s | -26 dBFS | — | auto-matched 92% | |
| 2026-07-17 | 18:38:40 | single | 3 | 39.3s | -48 dBFS | — | auto-matched 92% |
Barking was captured by a fixed directional microphone monitoring the property boundary, recording continuously to timestamped digital audio. Events were detected automatically by an on-device sound-recognition model, refined against barking the operator confirmed as genuine during review, and each retained event was confirmed on review of the recording. Event breakdown: aggressive ×1, bark ×12, bark ×13, single ×9. All times are shown in the recorder’s local timezone. An audio recording of every one of the 35 logged incidents is retained (16 kHz mono) and available on request; any incidental human speech detected nearby a bark is automatically muted from the retained audio (or the clip withheld entirely where speech could not be cleanly separated from the bark), so only the dog’s barking is preserved as evidence. Level readings (dBFS) are relative to this recording unit’s own full scale as calibrated at setup for its placement, and are not absolute sound-pressure (SPL/dB(A)) measurements; the Level column is a same-unit relative visual only.
I declare that the above is a true and accurate record of barking observed and recorded at the times and dates stated.